Category Archives: Sentenced to Death

the dead man’s zone

a hairy bear-of-a-man, my dad knew
only how to love and fight death
matches.  unless knocked unconscious
or it was broken up, somebody was doomed
to die.  simple as that.
to beg my mom not to leave, my dad
shoved a pistol into her lipsticked mouth.
she left him anyway, daring
to live – and, if possible,
he adored her even more for it.  Sometimes
violence is the only love one gets.  my dad

used to brag
                 about getting his top four front teeth
knocked out.  they’d been surgically replaced, twice –
courtesy of the U.S. Army.  first time, a boxing match.
second time was the story
he told, retold, and retold.  he’d tilt back his head, yawning
open his mouth to display the gunmetal rears
of those perfectly machined Army teeth.  “See?
I was arguing with my ex-wife and called her a bitch.
That damned fool shot up and kicked my teeth
down my throat.  I never called her a bitch again.
Not to her face,” he’d chuckle.  he’d show photos
of my mom’s brother, a taekwondo master.  in one
a three-foot-high stack of red bricks parted
left and right in neat waves, frozen mid-air
by the camera, my uncle’s brutal chop caught
cracking through the bottom brick.
sometimes love needs violence like that.  a heart attack

killed my dad during my murder trial.
i was relieved because he had sworn to God
to get us both shot to pieces by the police
right there in the courtroom if I got convicted –
and I wasn’t quite as eager to die
while attempting to escape my death
sentences, my two failed suicides aside.

ten years later my tiny Korean mom came to visit me
on death row.  i had to ask, “Mom, why
did you even marry my dad to begin with?
You two were so different, I just can’t understand it.”
she dropped her wrinkled gaze, as if weary or
embarrassed, then looked up with eyes ablaze.  i flinched
as she launched into a story.  “You father was so handsome!
Not like after he got fat.”  ((she pronounced “after”
as apter and “fat” as pat)) she bloated out her cheeks
to show “fat face” then slowly exhaled, making a scraping,
bubbling, throaty growl
to indicate visceral disgust.  it summarized her
feelings following their divorce.  then she went back
to being dreamy-eyed and tender.

“He came into bar with friend.  Me and my sister there. 
They so handsome in uniform.  You father was better looking.”
she lowered her voice at the end as if revealing her secret.
“It was disco bar.  He ask me to dance – Oh, my God,
he such bad dancer!  But cute.  You father, he dance
like this.  No matter song, he dance like this.”  she sprang up
in the cramped visitation booth to demonstrate
a big man, a big moment.  i ducked

to study her
through the six-inch-tall, two-foot-wide, waist-level window –
through the black iron bars and double-paned, grimy plexiglas
as graffiti-scratched as a nasty gas station bathroom stall,
through greasy handprints holding hands through the glass,
through crusty bodily fluids, through all this history
of lust, pain, anger and disgust, loneliness and madness and
beauty, all of which tried to distract me
from my origins, my heritage, my parents.  but I was, finally,
ready to see them as real people, not just symbols
of dysfunction.  and so I watched

my mom raise her delicate fists, spin them one-over-the-other
like Ali hitting a speed bag at heart-level, while two-stepping
back-and-forth, twisting slightly at the hip
on the back-step to toss a take-a-hike thumb over
her shoulder.  “You see?  Like this…  Like this…
All the song, like this…” she said giggling
and panting like she did forty years earlier
at nineteen.  she was breathless with adrenaline.
i had never seen her like this.  so animated. 
so alive.
i laughed too, because I saw how it must’ve been.

in the midst of all her teasing about my dad’s bad dancing
i spotted the operative phrase:  “all the songs.”
translation:  she stayed on the dance floor with him,
laughed and joked with him, tripped and fell head-first
in love with him.  it was simple, it was pure, it was even
atavistic, drawing on a primitive period when a violent
amount of eye-contact, body grinding, pantomime
and empathy’s grunting communicated everything.  when
each had to give the other their absolute undivided
attention or they’d miss something.  neither spoke
the other’s native language, but the tongue of raw humanity
transcended their cultural barriers.  they were smitten.

it was only twelve years, seven pregnancies, and five kids
later, once my dad’s schizophrenia began to speak, that
his violence turned divisive.  till then, my mom said,
“A lot of Korean, they hate American soldier.  Every time
we go out people cuss us, spit at me.  We fight
together.  But you father, he very proud,
very strong.  Always he want fight for me.   A lot
of people go hospital.”  she was virtually swooning
and had to sit back down.  i did not know this woman.

within weeks my parents married, having a traditional
Korean wedding, yet their honeymoon attitude was ruined
when the Army wouldn’t acknowledge it as binding:  it was time
for my dad to return to America but the Army stiff-armed
my mother.  when he tried to go AWOL she urged him
to just come back.  he promised and she promised
to wait for him.

the Demilitarized Zone was a strip of land that ran
like a ribbon the entire east-to-west length between
North and South Korea.  it represented the fragile
nature of peace between enemies who used to be family.
it was off-limits.                                           if either side
spotted anyone within that tense ribbon of land, they
might shoot without warning.  sometimes the North
took pot-shots at American soldiers, who helped the South
patrol it, on foot.  the terrain was jungle like, riddled
with landmines.  ((it described my parents’ post-divorce
dynamic exactly)) the DMZ was aptly nicknamed
the Dead Man’s Zone.  the only way to reach my mom
was for my dad to get re-assigned to the DMZ.
it took a year.

“He came back for me.  You father.  He came back for me. My family
say he wouldn’t.  Everybody say he wouldn’t, say he only want
one thing.  They make me give up
baby.  They say they kill baby if I don’t
give him up.  But you father come back.
He so upset when no baby there.  So upset.  But
he understand.”  she started to cry.  i didn’t know
what to say
so I said nothing.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR.  George Wilkerson lives on Death Row. He is a talented writer with a unique style, and a solid commitment to his craft. He is an occasional contributor to WITS, a co-author of Crimson Letters, an eye-opening book released in 2020, and his writing can be found on several other platforms. We always enjoy hearing from him – simply put, I look forward to every submission he sends in, knowing he will never disappoint.

Mr. Wilkerson can be contacted at:
George T. Wilkerson #0900281
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285

Loading

From Bosom To Bowels: a cry from Death Row

Lord, why did you spare me
the night I lay shot and cried out to you?

All my transgressions I laid at your feet,
yet you turned not away from my spirit.

Now my troubles are imminent death
in the form of state sanctioned execution.

I have counted the faces of those gone down
in the chamber, their legacy left untold.

I, too, am slated for an unrighteous death,
Will anonymity mark my grave?

Am I forgotten, Lord, or just forsaken
and no longer worthy of your care?

I am deemed lowly and unfit
by those who call on your name.

There was a time when your mark laid heavily on me
and I was overwhelmed by your grace.

Now you give favor to my closest friends
and made me a victim of their deceit.

Even my thoughts are shackled and confined
to a chasm erected from anguish.

I have searched for your comfort in every way
and turned up only disaster and dread.

Do broken spirits make it into heaven?
Does my tongue spew curses of thee or sing praise?

Is repentance best served as a dying declaration
and faithfulness a daily chore?

Is there a path to eternity from Death Row,
a place set on misery and darkness?

And still, God, I trust in you,
hear my prayer when the morning comes.

Reject me not before I am called to your judgment
but find mercy in my shortcomings.

From bosom to bowels you have shielded me
when I was close to death.

From your will I strayed to worldly desires
and was left with my shame to bear.

My anger is of my own doing
my faithlessness was my doom.

I am trodden under the heels of my enemies
but in you, Lord, I am redeemed.

You have given me the way to enter your kingdom,
your glory is my salvation.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Terry Robinson writes under the pen name ‘Chanton’, is a member of the Board of Directors of WITS, and heads up a book club on NC’s Death Row. He is an author who has found purpose not only in his love of writing, but also in lending his voice to those who cannot speak for themselves. Because he is an innocent man on death row, his gift of expressing himself and his experiences through the written word is invaluable in raising awareness of issues within the criminal justice system. The ease with which he was put on Death Row for over two decades, in contrast to the struggle to undo an injustice is what his life examplifies and he shares that experience with grace and eloquence like no other could.

Terry continues to work on his memoirs, as well as a book of fiction, and he can be contacted at:
Terry Robinson #0349019
Central Prison
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285



Loading

Make My Hands Stronger!

People tell me to have faith, and I get it, I really do.  I always want to have faith, but sometimes my mind is cluttered with so much doubt.  They’ll try to encourage me and say things like, “You are so strong, Chucky,” meaning mentally.  If only I had a penny for every time somebody told me that.

The truth is, they don’t see it, but sometimes things hit me out of the blue, and I cry for reasons I’m not totally sure of.  I stress  about everything, from small to big issues.  I recently became a grandfather.  I can’t tell you how it feels not being there for him.  I failed as a parent to my own children.  I see my grandson as my parental redemption ticket – however, I’m still locked up.  And my stress continues. 

Psychologically, there is nothing like being on Texas death row.  Every day is a struggle within a struggle.  You have to fight.  You have to fight for toilet paper.  You have to fight for commissary, a phone call, mail or Jpays, decent and edible food.  And you have to keep on fighting just to be treated like a person and not some animal.  What is even more insane is, just when you think you have resolved an issue, the next day you have to resolve it all over again.  I think I’ve heard it said, “Hell is a repetitious place.”

I rarely talk about the things that go on here.  I don’t talk about it to my loved ones, ‘cause I don’t want to worry them.  If I knew they were worried, it would cause me more stress.  So, I deal with it alone, as I have always done.  Self-absorbed to self-abuse… self.  I wouldn’t recommend that mind-set to anyone.  It’s not ideal or healthy.  But, in here, I know there is nothing any other human being can do to alleviate the inner loneliness.

Nehemiah once prayed to God, “Now strengthen my hands.”  He had to fight every day and when he grew weary, and it seemed he could not go on, he prayed to God for the strength to endure.  So do I.  That’s how I get by.  With God, I am able to get through this.  Without God, I don’t believe I’d be alive to be able to write these words with the hands that God has made stronger.

There is also a facebook page dedicated to sharing Charles Mamou’s troubling case.

 Photo, courtesy of ©manfredbaumann.com

TO CONTACT CHARLES MAMOU:
Charles Mamou #999333
Polunsky Unit 12-CD-53
3872 South FM 350
Livingston, TX 77351

You can also reach him through jpay.com.

SIGN HIS PETITION – LEARN ABOUT HIS CASE.  Charles Mamou is a long time WITS writer. He is part of our writing family and his case has been studied and shared here for a couple years. Please sign a petition requesting that his case be truly investigated – for the first time. If you learn enough about his case, you will likely agree, there was not much done in the way of investigation. What we have been able to learn, supports that. Please sign.

Charles Mamou Reinvestigation

Dear Ms. Ogg,

In the interest of justice, please reinvestigate the case of Charles Mamou, Jr. He has been on death row for over two decades.

There was evidence available to the D.A. in 1998 that was not shared with Charles Mamou. That evidence would have called into question witness testimony and should have been pursued in 1998 when it could have led to the guilty party. It included phone records of suspects that could have been traced. Not only was information not shared, some withheld information was exploited, such as the prosecutor communicating to the jury that Mamou sexually assaulted the victim, but not informing them or the defendant of a rape kit that was collected, which they had processed.

References to an individual named 'Shawn' being present that evening were consistently down-played and dismissed by the prosecution, yet a fax addressed to the D.A. from HPD specifically notes, handwritten by an investigator, phone calls made from 'Shawn' to a key witness, Howard Scott, at 12:19 a.m. and 3:12 a.m. that night. Mr. Mamou was unaware there were calls made. Those phone calls were also received by a key witnesses' phone, who testified he was asleep at the time, and his phone was not ringing. The prosecutor did not stop the proceedings when his witness, along with another of his witnesses, indicated they were sleeping. The prosecutor did not ask them why their phones were in use or inform Mamou or the jury that their phones were in use that night while they testified to sleeping.

New information has come to light that was not shared with the jury, including a letter that calls into question a key witness’s testimony. There are also witnesses who saw Charles Mamou when he was supposed to have been with the victim, a video statement of the key witness that does not mirror his testimony, and a statement from a state’s witness that cannot be located in the HPD case file. That witness has since told an investigator he saw the victim alive.

There are other issues as well, including notes in HPD's file that indicate biological evidence was signed out in 2019. When questioned regarding the reason for the removal, HPD communicated that only the D.A.'s Office could request evidence be removed, to which a communication with the D.A.'s office indicated no such request had been made.

For these reasons and more, we are asking you to reinvestigate Cause No. 800112. Thank you for your consideration.

%%your signature%%



Thank you for signing. Please share.
828 signatures = 83% of goal
0
1,000

Share this with your friends:

     

Loading

The Mushroom

His features typically dour, Peter
seemed transfigured today when
he returned from wherever. 
He was giddy, like  a person after

sex, “I just came
from visiting the orthopedist at
an outside hospital.  She said
my herniated discs are squeeze-

ing against my sciatic nerve.  It’s
excruciating, and I need surgery.
But guess what?”  I shrugged.
“On the way back, they opened

the window a little.
I pressed my face into the gap
the whole time.”  I noticed red
parallel welts tracked up his chin,

lips, and cheeks – two inches
apart. Even a transport car’s air
is restrictive.  As an extension of
prison, it’s a portable cell with

an incarcerated atmosphere:
A death row prisoner cramped in
back, bound in full-restraints –
handcuffs, ankle-shackles; waist

chains connecting them – behind
a stab-proof stainless steel cage
protecting armed guards up front.
Evidently, the line dividing freedom

from imprisonment is thinner than
a thought.  Even now his face is
pressed against that two-inch gap,
                        mushrooming out,

tongue flapping happily in wind. 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR.  George Wilkerson lives on Death Row. He is a talented writer with a unique style, and a solid commitment to his craft. He is an occasional contributor to WITS, a co-author of Crimson Letters, an eye-opening book released in 2020, sharing the voices of those living on North Carolina’s Death Row, and his writing can be found on several other platforms. We always enjoy hearing from him.

Mr. Wilkerson can be contacted at:
George T. Wilkerson #0900281
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285


Loading

Charles Mamou – A Call For Justice

Charles Mamou Reinvestigation

Dear Ms. Ogg,

In the interest of justice, please reinvestigate the case of Charles Mamou, Jr. He has been on death row for over two decades.

There was evidence available to the D.A. in 1998 that was not shared with Charles Mamou. That evidence would have called into question witness testimony and should have been pursued in 1998 when it could have led to the guilty party. It included phone records of suspects that could have been traced. Not only was information not shared, some withheld information was exploited, such as the prosecutor communicating to the jury that Mamou sexually assaulted the victim, but not informing them or the defendant of a rape kit that was collected, which they had processed.

References to an individual named 'Shawn' being present that evening were consistently down-played and dismissed by the prosecution, yet a fax addressed to the D.A. from HPD specifically notes, handwritten by an investigator, phone calls made from 'Shawn' to a key witness, Howard Scott, at 12:19 a.m. and 3:12 a.m. that night. Mr. Mamou was unaware there were calls made. Those phone calls were also received by a key witnesses' phone, who testified he was asleep at the time, and his phone was not ringing. The prosecutor did not stop the proceedings when his witness, along with another of his witnesses, indicated they were sleeping. The prosecutor did not ask them why their phones were in use or inform Mamou or the jury that their phones were in use that night while they testified to sleeping.

New information has come to light that was not shared with the jury, including a letter that calls into question a key witness’s testimony. There are also witnesses who saw Charles Mamou when he was supposed to have been with the victim, a video statement of the key witness that does not mirror his testimony, and a statement from a state’s witness that cannot be located in the HPD case file. That witness has since told an investigator he saw the victim alive.

There are other issues as well, including notes in HPD's file that indicate biological evidence was signed out in 2019. When questioned regarding the reason for the removal, HPD communicated that only the D.A.'s Office could request evidence be removed, to which a communication with the D.A.'s office indicated no such request had been made.

For these reasons and more, we are asking you to reinvestigate Cause No. 800112. Thank you for your consideration.

%%your signature%%



Thank you for signing. Please share.
828 signatures = 83% of goal
0
1,000

Share this with your friends:

     

Charles Mamou is a WITS writer. He has always maintained his innocence.  He has been on death row for over twenty years.  There is evidence and information the Harris County prosecution had that Charles Mamou didn’t know existed for over two decades.  That information could have been used to determine what happened to the victim if anyone had pursued it.

Nothing physically ties Charles Mamou to the scene of the crime, other than the testimony of witnesses that were involved in a drug deal with him that night.  There is not a fingerprint of his there. There is not a footprint of his there. No witnesses saw him there. There was a shell casing – that cannot be tied definitively to any weapon, but no weapon was ever found. Mamou was from out of town, the men who testified were not. The body was found in a location even the police described as difficult to locate.  One of the witnesses worked for Orkin – on the side of town where the body was found behind a house for sale.

The individuals who testified against Charles Mamou were apparently never charged for their involvement in any of the events that took place that night – and phone records the prosecution had access to indicate two of those witnesses were not telling the truth on the stand.

A letter never presented to the jury and written by the ‘star’ witness who said Charles Mamou confessed to him says, “I’m glad you didn’t tell me shit about that cause I don’t wanna know shit, I feel better off that way.”

Charles Mamou has waited long enough for someone to help him.  He’s not asking for any breaks – he’s asking for an investigation into his case, one that includes all the evidence the Houston Police Department had twenty years ago, which includes trace evidence obtained in a rape kit that was never shared with Mamou. 

Please sign the above letter asking the Harris County District Attorney’s Office to reinvestigate this case.

UPDATE: This post was temporarily removed, after I was contacted and told I couldn’t share this information. After a thorough review, I disagree. The information came from trial transcripts that Charles Mamou gave me access to. In addition to that, the other records are public and the letter was written to Charles Mamou and belongs to him. Walk In Those Shoes is about writers in prison and trying to understand their experience with the justice system. If I can’t share public information without being warned and told not to – is it a wonder people end up on death row that are innocent?

Photograph of Charles Mamou, courtesy of ©manfredbaumann.com

Loading

Should We Kill? My Thoughts On The Death Penalty

Jesus was executed, as well as countless others throughout history.  Although Christians believe that was a necessary evil, looking at what was done to a man that had a reputation for kindness and advocating for the downtrodden, one is struck by the injustice and immorality of it.  Jesus wasn’t a murderer or a rapist or a thief.   Can anything justify the torture and execution of a man that committed no crime, other than irritating those in power? 

Even if looked at from the retributive theory, Jesus’ execution was not justified.  He did not commit murder, and Pilate most likely did not believe Jesus deserved the sentence he was given, but felt pressure at the time.  Thus, Jesus was executed.  The most famous of all retributive punishments is an illustration of all that can go wrong with the perspective that execution is acceptable. Although Christians know that Jesus had a path to walk, looking at this case apart from the religious aspects, it couldn’t have been more poorly justified.

Jesus’ crime, according to authorities, was treason, calling himself king.  For that he was beaten, tortured, and left to die on a cross.  The punishment did not fit the crime.  Those same words can be said about what sometimes happens in the halls of justice every day on every reach of the planet – outside forces, such as pressure in this particular case, influence the sentence.  It could be a court appointed attorney with no time to adequately prepare up against a highly motivated prosecutor, well practiced at manipulating a jury.  It could be a police force that has a tendency to toy with evidence.  It could be the color of the defendant’s skin in a courtroom full of people that don’t resemble him or her.  But, as we saw in the case of Jesus, people are not perfect and sentences don’t always match crimes.  This happens more than anyone would like to believe, and it is certain to continue happening.

As of this writing there is a man on death row in Texas, and he has been there for over two decades.  In his case, the prosecution had evidence they did not share with the defense that could have been pursued, and if it had been shared, could have very well impacted the outcome of the case.  This information is now known, documented and available to anyone who wants to see it, but Charles Mamou has had four attorneys over the last two decades who never located the information.  It wasn’t until an unpaid advocate came along and started researching the case that everything that had been there all along came to light.  It wasn’t a trivial tidbit, there was actually a rape kit discovered twenty years later that has physical evidence in it.  There were phone records of key witnesses who testified they were asleep.  The information was never shared with the defendant.  Mamou’s case is not an anomaly.  If you work with the incarcerated for any length of time, you will come to learn cases like his happen more than anyone would like to admit.

The argument that the number of lives saved from the use of capital punishment as a deterrent, is hard pressed if the true number of unfair prosecutions were tallied.  There is no way to even calculate them all accurately, as most cases are left unpursued in spite of questions left behind.  It is naivety that believes wrongful or over incarcerations are few in numbers and therefore a viable trade off.  From the beginning of time, and the execution of a man whose reputation has remained that of a ‘good man’ over hundreds of years, until today when you can walk in any well-populated death row facility and find people that have not had a hand in murder, we have gotten it wrong.  The numbers are greater than anyone would like to publicly acknowledge.

For the sake of argument, and although unarguable evidence has shown us differently from the beginning of time, we will pretend justice is always perfect.  We will overlook the imperfections and intentional mistakes along the way, such as the execution of Jesus, a good man.  Let’s say then, punishment should reflect the crime, an eye for an eye.  Yet, we have been getting it wrong one way or another from the beginning of time on that as well.  If it were truly to be an eye for an eye and a reflection of the crime, we would rob from robbers, we would rape rapists and we would murder murderers.  In the world of right and wrong and if we are going to make rules of order, you can’t compare apples to oranges.  A perfect system of an eye for an eye that punishes according to crime, can’t have exceptions to the rule.  What makes murder any different than rape? 

In our country, we execute people who have not actually had a hand in a murder, sometimes letting the actual ‘murderer’ receive a lesser sentence.  It is called the Law Of Parties, and people who have not had a hand in murder have been and will continue to be executed under it.  So, in the ‘eye for an eye’ thinking, we make exceptions for all cases except murder where we stand firm on taking a life for a life, while letting the rapists go unraped, and not only do we make exceptions, we make exceptions within the exceptions.  If a murderer has the right attorney and chooses to testify against other parties, involved or not, he betters his chances of not having to pay the price of murder with his life, making himself an exception, and in doing so, assists in the execution of an individual who played no part in the murder, creating another exception. The overall theory of justifying capital punishment under the ‘eye for an eye’ platform that justifies the act as the appropriate punishment has no foundation, as it is not even close to being uniformly performed and enforced.

To the argument that there is no equal punishment to the taking of a life other than the taking of a life, there is the nasty side of the argument that most like to sweep under the rug.  Let’s suppose that we never make mistakes, and the system is always fair, and we always execute the actual ‘murderer’, and not the driver of the murderer or the friend who was with the murderer on that particular evening and had no idea a murder was going to take place. In a perfect system, murder would be the appropriate choice, but should we require a murderer to murder themselves?  How do we accomplish taking a life without getting our own hands dirty?

When we get to the point when we are going to actually take a life, what justification can we use for our action of taking a life, and how are those who have a hand in the act absolved?  Does that call for more exceptions to the rules?  Is it acceptable to murder a person who we have ‘decided’ is guilty of murder, not necessarily guilty?  At this point, we have to embrace all the exceptions to all the rules that we have already established as acceptable, and accept those who are innocent, those wrongly accused, those who were involved but did not murder and those who actually did commit murder and lump them all together.  They are all equally ‘guilty of murder’, and we can only accomplish this if we have decided we are justified in killing an innocent person in the name of maintaining the death penalty.  So, we find ourselves having to pay people to then become murderers of the innocent as well as the guilty because of all the exceptions to the rules that have to be in place to maintain a death penalty.

It doesn’t end there.  According to our own policies and systems, involved parties are sometimes executed along with the actual murder or murderers.  One would have to label those who purposefully lead a person to the execution chamber, the one who voices the command to start the process, the actual medical personnel involved in the process as all parties to the taking of life of the guilty and innocent, we have determined that exception has to be made.  By our own standards, what about those who have fattened up the victim for the kill for over two decades, are they not a party to the murder?   Can it end there?  What of the prosecutor and his co-counsel?  What of the Judge and jury?  What of the defense counsel who did not bother to look for the evidence?  So, the actual taking of a life of someone like Charles Mamou, will have participation of countless people along the way, including some who simply turned a blind eye.  Should we include those who were informed before his execution but chose to proceed with the knowledge that his trial was unfair and did not provide all the information to the jury?

How many people have a hand in the murder of the innocent, in a society that endorses capital punishment?  How many people turned a blind eye to what was happening to Jesus when he was executed? Which brings us back to the religious justification, people often building their argument on words from the Bible, using their interpretation of segments to further their cause.  What can be certain about the teachings of Jesus was his call for love, mercy, and compassion.  Portions of the bible can be picked out to justify murder, but there is no strong case for it, not nearly as strong as Jesus’ teaching of loving your neighbor and turning the other cheek.  Who are you to condemn?  Although the execution might be punishment of the murderer, who is to say that vengeance is not God’s?  I’d much prefer to err on the side of caution, and not hold someone down in an execution chamber and pump poison into their veins, assuming that vengeance is mine.  Using religion as an argument to justify murder is at best a stretch, at worst a mockery. 

So, what of the argument that there is only one punishment called for when a person walks into a movie theater and starts shooting, murdering fifty innocent people before being taken into custody before witnesses.  Death, surely, is the only choice. That is the strongest argument I have heard, and I appreciate the sentiment and desire, yet, it is not that simple.  It comes full circle, back to the beginning.  We have a system that has been proven unjust repeatedly since the execution of Jesus. Influence brought about his execution, not any action on his part.  The ramifications of leaving the door open in the name of our hypothetical deranged murderer who murdered fifty in cold blood in front of witnesses needs to be considered.  The system doesn’t just end with his execution.  Let’s say we all want that one man dead.  At what cost?  We have an unfair system, influenced by power, money, race, and, believe it or not, sometimes bad intentions.  The system is run by humans, both good and bad.  The price to pay for leaving the door open to execute our theater murderer, is, in part, the lives of the innocent lost, the humanity of the officers who have spent a decade with the individual they have worked around and know is innocent and a good man, and the future resentment of the children of the innocent man who in turn possibly become murderers because of an unjust system.   By leaving the door open for our theater murderer, we are leaving the door open to the mistakes that have been and will continue to be made, along with the unjust on-purposes, and the chain reaction of it all.

The death penalty is not cost-effective.  It cannot be justified by religion.  It makes murderers out of innocent people.  It has and will continue to be used to kill people who have not committed murder.  It does not make us safer by taking mass murderers off the streets, when that person is already removed from the streets. It does not deter the mentally ill or suicide bombers or people determined to inflict pain.  The death penalty leaves the door open to all that can and does go wrong and has no moral justification.  There is a heavy moral price to pay for maintaining a method of disposing of our movie theater madman.  

“But, what does my innocence matter?  Where did it get me but a bus ride to prison while shackled both by ankles and spirit to a dread that becomes so unbearable – death is a welcome resolve.  How relevant is innocence to time long gone and opportunities forever missed, when your dignity is in a shambles, you’ve been stripped of your identity and you have nothing left to call your own but an Opus number.  With no pride left for which to hide behind, to admit wrongdoing would not be so difficult – the hardest thing to do is continue proclaiming my innocence.” – Terry Robinson, Death Row, NC

Loading

The Things That Remain

Some tragedies are gradual, prolonging dismay, others swift and unexpected, yet loss in any form effects in us a void that can only be filled with time.  It is loss to which we are all akin, regardless of status, color or creed, none excluded from the woeful affliction all of humankind will suffer.  Tear-stained cheeks, fine suits and condolences are the soothing, necessary etiquette, after which we look to move on – but occasionally we find we can’t.

Chris was a childhood friend I grew up with on Fountain Drive, a project housing development set on the outskirts of town.  There were no ills of the inner-city there, like drugs and prostitution.  Sequestered by fields and lush greenery, we were burgeoning country folk.  We scoured ditches for crayfish, climbed trees to pick wild berries, and explored the far reaches of the surrounding woods where we carved out a world all our own.

A favorite pastime was the community football game.  Narrow eyes stared across a makeshift field as we rivaled one another.   We tackled, grappled, and cussed with fervor to demonstrate our toughness, but in the end we always left as friends, looking forward to carrying on the next day.

It was the older kids in the neighborhood that first ganged up on Chris – my brother and his closest friends.  It was an assault that came without merit as Chris had committed no offense.  Instead of contesting their egregious violation, Chris up and ran away, unaware the flight-mode mentality would begin a lifelong recurrence.

Although a rural bubble, Fountain Drive was not the easiest place to live. No one qualified for low-income housing more than single mothers and senior citizens, and with many of our moms off working to improve their conditions and the elderly nestled up to their daytime television shows, we ran around mostly unsupervised and growing unrulier by the day.

We had petty differences, some escalating to fist fights, that seldom outlasted the day.  We ransacked the neighborhood community center and egged each other on to steal.  Everything from throwing rocks at passing cars to prank calling the fire department, our mischief knew no bounds, yet nothing would ignite our frenzy more than chasing after Chris.

Chris, himself, was a passive misfit – just barely on the right side of wrong.  His misdeeds were rather frivolous, swiping an item from a clothesline or lifting coins for his mother’s purse.  He was never one to talk trash, though his size was intimidating enough.  At ten, he was a head taller than most teenagers, and by thirteen, he was the same age as his shoe size.  With shoulders as wide as a welcome embrace and powerful legs that were the getting-away kind, we stood almost no chance of catching him, yet we were thrilled to try.

Chris, however, was a gentle soul.  He was thoughtful and forgiving, and usually, within a day or so, he was back amongst the clique.  Despite his hulking size, he had a boyish quality that was much more fun to keep around, and over time, our betrayals became less frequent, until we no longer chased him away. 

By fifteen, Chris’ interests had matured, and he began to venture outside the neighborhood to other parts of town.  It was courting girls that had procured his attention, and he thought to visit them whenever possible. However, as we had long given up chasing Chris, other kids from around town had just begun, until it seemed that bullying Chris was the most expected thing to do.

Once, I witnessed him fleeing from some guys – but did nothing in the way of help, afraid I was a word in his defense away from being bullied myself.  Chris, though, had an impeccable reputation for outpacing his foes, as many of his aggressors gave chase for sport, all except one… Mikey.

A local badass who favored drinking and fighting, Mikey was the epitome of trouble.  He was the guy the other bullies steered clear of.  It was a brisk night outside a nightclub when Mikey set his sights on Chris – but this time, there would be no running away.  Instead, Chris fought back.

As it turned out, Chris didn’t run all those years because he was fearful – it was a method of harm prevention.  He figured as long as he didn’t hurt anyone today, things would be better tomorrow.  He ran away because he was being a better friend to us than we ever were to him.  Unlike Mikey, who was ruthless – not to mention a sore loser.

Some few nights later while walking home alone, Chris spotted a suspicious vehicle.   He discovered that it was Mikey, along with some friends.  Outnumbered, Chris had little choice but to flee, taking cover behind some houses as Mikey stepped out of the car with a gun and fired a shot in the dark.  Assuming Chris was long gone, Mikey and his crew sped off, unaware the bullet had hit its mark as Chris lay dying in the night.

It wasn’t until the next morning his body was discovered, entangled in the brush.  Chris had been killed at just sixteen…  and I never got to say, ‘I’m sorry’.

Regrets, juxtapose to loss, are the things that remain, the stuff of good memories, shared experiences, and lost opportunities.  After 32 years, it’s regrets that have kept Chris alive in my heart, and without which, I fear I will lose one of the best people I ever knew.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Terry Robinson often writes under the pen name ‘Chanton’, and is a member of the Board of Directors of WITS. He is an author who has found purpose not only in his love of writing, but also in lending his voice to those who cannot speak for themselves. He is also an innocent man who has lived on death row for over 20 years. Terry continues to work on his memoirs, as well as a book of fiction, and we are proud to call him a member of this team.

Mr. Robinson can be contacted at:
Terry Robinson #0349019
Central Prison
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285

Loading

Dressed For Halloween

Holidays locked up are a mix of emotions – happy to be alive, sad to be here, indifferent to being surrounded by people you don’t know instead of loved ones.  When I was free, holidays were usually spent celebrating with family, eating too much, drinking too much, and regretting it the next day, all with a smile on my face. 

As a child, I loved Halloween.  I’d dress up in my costume on October 30th and sleep in it just to be prepared.  I loved candy, especially free candy, and I wanted to be ready to go.  Those memories are engraved in my head.

October 31, 2018, changed my Halloween memories of free candy. People in the free world were dressing up in costumes that day, and I was in Dallas County Jail dressing up in a suit and tie for my final day of a capital murder trial.  It was the day the jury would make the life or death decision.  They could either send me to spend the rest of my life living in prison or sentence me to death by lethal injection. There I was in a courtroom on free candy day, dressed to impress and hoping for the best. 

Death was their final decision – forever replacing my joyful memories of Halloween. October 31 is now just a dreadful anniversary…

ABOUT THE WRITER. Kristopher Love has never written for WITS before, but he submitted this piece to our last writing contest. I am not a judge, so I don’t look at the entries very closely, but as I was going through the returned material, this caught my eye. I hope Mr. Love continues to pursue writing. He can be contacted at:

Kristopher Love #999614
Polunsky Unit
3872 FM 350 South
Livingston, TX 77351

Loading

Class of 99: Day 3…

It’s all a dream. Or is it?

Something was off, I could sense it.  It looked like Madear’s home, it just didn’t feel like her home.  I could hear a familiar hymn being sung sotto voce towards the side of her home where her adjacent storage building was.  She kept her washer and dryer there.  She also had two extra freezers in there holding tons of assorted meats.  Sodas were stacked to one side of the wall as high as five-feet, and gallons of assorted juices lined the floor.  Madear loved buying in bulk because she loved to cook and feed others.  There was an area opposite the beverages where all her holiday decorations were kept – including a unique white crystal four-foot holiday colored Christmas tree she proudly displayed in her window every year.  To this day I’ve never seen anything like it.  It was also the place I first kissed a girl, Carla Landry, and I liked it!

This area was not huge by any standard, but my little brother and some of my friends often used the wash-house, as we called it, as a club house. Madear would be there daily, putting loads of clothes in to wash, and once dried, she would fold and inspect to see if the whites were white enough or if the colored clothes were bright enough.  She had no problem rewashing the clothes until they met her satisfaction. 

So, it wasn’t odd to find her inside.  I rushed through the door and saw her rocking away in her hand crafted wooden rocking chair that she used to find her Zen-moments in, relaxing or simply contemplating what she would do next.   Madear didn’t speak much.  I never heard her raise her voice, but she always evaluated any situation before acting, and when she did speak, her observations or opinions were always thought-out.

I could not see the features of her face, no eyes, mouth or lips – nothing.  There was nothing but warm, blinding light.  The rest of her body, from the neck down, was there.   Even her favorite sundress graced the length of her body.  She rocked away, faster than I recalled her doing.  I tried to advance closer, but I could not move.  It was as if I was stuck in cement that had long since dried, my feet buried. 

“Don’t worry, Baby.   Everything will be fine.  You’ll see.  You’ll be fine,” she repeated.  Her voice sounded as if she was speaking to me from behind a waterfall… though soothing and comforting.  I wanted to lay my head on her lap, allowing her to pat and massage me the way one would do a cat.  Her voice brought about a sense of conviction to my soul.  I could feel tears, hot tears, running down my cheeks.  My heart started to beat more urgently.  I blinked for a second and Madear and her rocking chair started fading away in the pasture behind her home.  She faded the way a home run baseball floats away…  and is gone.

“Chow time, maggots!  Get your asses up if ya’ll wanta eats!” barked a guard.

‘Fuck!’  Steel gates crashed into more steel.  ‘It was all a dream?  A stupid, fucking dream!?!’  The mist of tears I had shed were still damp on my cheeks.  My heart was still thumping.  I turned over to see what time it was, fifteen minutes after three in the morning.  I’m not a morning person and my weakness was affirmation of that as I turned on the cell’s light.  I’m not a breakfast eater either, and I was going to refuse because it was too early to be eating, but the growling sounds coming from my empty stomach were the motivation I needed to eat something.   I was hungry.  No, I was starving, having eaten little to nothing my first few days on the famous Texas Death Row.  Pancakes were served.  They were not IHOP worthy, but I wasn’t going to be picky.  I was also given an 8-ounce carton of milk, a 4-ounce carton of orange juice and four spoons of fruit cocktail.  I ate everything before going back to sleep, hoping I wouldn’t dream again. 

Around ten o-clock in the morning an officer opened the bean slot to the cell and threw a big commissary bag in, “Some of your fellow-condemned brothers put some things together for ya.”

I stared, my eyes fixed on him, wondering if he was joking.  I don’t know if I expected a snake to crawl from the bag or a bomb to go off at any moment.  Sure, I was paranoid.  This wasn’t Kansas anymore.  I didn’t know what ‘this’ was.

After some time, I got up, kicked the bag a little, and waited for a reaction.  Nothing.  I gently opened the bag to find a bunch of snacks, four writing tablets, envelopes, and over fifty bucks in stamps which, due to my naiveté, I used to tape photos of my children to the walls.  I had no idea I was supposed to use stamps to write.  No shit.  I hadn’t written a letter to anyone at that point.  I communicated through daily phone calls or visits.  There were socks, a thermal top, and some much needed hygiene products, all of which I greatly appreciated.   No note was given. No one shouted to get my attention.  Nothing. The act of charity was empathetically done.  Guys knew I was going through some things because they went through the same ‘new beginning’.  It was an act of kindness I greatly appreciated even though I had no one to thank.

I walked to the front of the cell to look out.  The place was teeming with sounds of existence, a farrago of inmate laughter, crashing steel, buzzing light fixtures that looked like something you’d expect to see in the beginning of the 20th century, as well as radios and multiple televisions that blared recklessly.  This ‘new world’, was too much for me to embrace, so I returned and sat on my bunk.  I grabbed photos of my children and their mothers, my mother and siblings, and I thought about what they were going through.  I loved them all dearly, and the more I thought about them, the more I cried.  I saw an unopened letter I had received the night before.  It was from one of my children’s mothers.  It started off like a Dear John letter.  She was telling me she was getting married to a truck driver.  A year earlier I shared a bed with her.  I immediately thought, ‘Where the fuck did he come from?’   At that moment, I was certain.  I was no longer dreaming.

ABOUT THE WRITER: Charles Mamou has been writing for WITS for quite some time and has always maintained his innocence. In the summer of 2019, it came to my attention Mr. Mamou had become very quiet. When I asked why, he explained he was out of appeals and awaiting an execution date. I asked to look at his documents. It didn’t take long to become very disturbed by what I saw. Some issues regarding Mr. Mamou’s case can be found here. Anyone with information regarding this case can contact me at contact@walkinthoseshoes.com.


There is also a facebook page dedicated to Charles Mamou’s troubling case.

 Photo, courtesy of ©manfredbaumann.com

TO CONTACT CHARLES MAMOU:
Charles Mamou #999333
Polunsky Unit 12-CD-53
3872 South FM 350
Livingston, TX 77351

You can also reach him through jpay.com.

Loading

Promise

The following is an excerpt from a poem written for his mother, a gift woven in words.

When I was but a little girl
I made myself a promise,
To rear my children with dignity,
Teach them to be honest.

But first, I had to grow,
Endure lots of pain,
Survive the throes of ghetto woes
Time and time again.

Things would not come easy,
At times I felt like crying,
Determined to gift-wrap the world
Or willing to die trying.

Winter boots and Easter suits
And summers filled with glee.
Never mind if I was suffocating,
As long as my kids could breathe.

So, I toiled by day and learned by night
Lunched on rice and bread.
Wore my children’s hand-me-downs
Just to get ahead.

I cooked and cleaned and in between
Encouraged my children to strive.
I scraped and clawed but through it all,
My eyes stayed on the prize.

Destiny for me was simply
Duty without break.
If asked to do it all over again,
I would not hesitate.

See, all I ever wanted
Was the life I never had
Served to my babies
In the absence of their dads.

I wanted to show them through persistence
They could have it all,
What matters most is how we rise,
Not so much how we fall.

My kids are now grown with kids of their own,
Some of those kids with child.
Some day when my story is told,
I hope I’ve made them proud.

All we have to offer the world,
The legacy we leave behind.
I pray all mothers love their children
As much as I love mine.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Terry Robinson often writes under the pen name ‘Chanton’ and is a co-author of Crimson Letters, Voices From Death Row. The above is only an excerpt from a poem he wrote for his mother who has been his biggest supporter. Terry continues to work on his memoirs, as well as a book of fiction. He has always maintained his innocence, and hopes to one day prove that and walk free. Mr. Robinson can be contacted at:
Terry Robinson #0349019
Central Prison
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285

Loading