Category Archives: Sentenced to Death

Vivere Senza Rimpianti!

I hate being on Texas Death Row.  The air.  The stripping nude four times a day on average so officers have something to do or look at.  The cold, faux-food.  The redundant radio station playing the same ole’ commercialized songs every half hour.  I hate my current existence so much, I even hate telling you about it.

We’re all enigmas here.  Each emotionally abused and scarred in some way, shape or form.  This is a place where a guy named Marty McFly can change his name into something catchy and it sticks like a new skin – Big Mac, Marty the Leotard, Mc-Dawg.  Guys can rename themselves after their city, town, zip code, favorite animal, or even a car – something they never would have thought of had they been free.  That’s one thing I don’t hate.  I find the names quite creative and the choices interesting.  At one point, I went by the name Louisiana because others couldn’t pronounce my last name correctly. 

In some regard I think I’m better off than some in here, having battled my own thoughts of suicide and self-harm.  There are times that are comforting, like when it’s quiet and I can read a good book and see the words come to life on the inner stage within my mind.  There’s nothing greater than that.   

Then – there’s visitation.  I love getting visits and a chance to get out of this cell, to be allowed to interact with ‘freeworld’ people and have a moment of nostalgia.  I saw a kid race another across the floor, and it brought back memories of seeing my own daughter doing the same exact thing two decades earlier. 

I wasn’t much of a talker when I was free, but I’ve since acquired a taste for conversing.  People fascinate me and I want to know and understand how they see the world, and how different cultures can be. 

I recently did a BBC interview with a lovely reporter.  It was my understanding the segment was to be focused on my beloved friend, Mary, who was here to visit me.  Perhaps I understood the angle.  Perhaps I didn’t.  Or, maybe, I was a self-centered bastard who thought that – once the camera began to roll – it was ‘action time’ and all about me.  Which would explain why I wanted to shave away the grey hairs from my face before the interview.  Why I urgently smoothed the Olay moisturizer sample I received inside one of my girlie magazines on my face to give me a glow when the big lights came on.  And maybe it explains why the first thing that came out of my mouth was, “Where’s my glam team?”

A few days before the interview I had to have a tooth removed, and I found myself talking on the opposite side of my mouth so the camera didn’t catch the side-gap in my mouth.  I am many things – true.  Add ‘vain’ to the long list.

I attempted to change the narrative of the interview by talking about me, my case and this environment as the British reporter shifted right to left in her chair out of patient frustration.  She was chasing a story.  I was chasing freedom and wanted the world to know it while I still had a chance to express it.  I could tell she ‘understood’.  Somewhere, hidden beneath her eyes, she knew I was a lonely soul, cast into a lonelier sea.  I may have seemed a bit ornery to her, or she may have even thought I was a meshugana.  I’ve been called the latter a few times. 

The reporter was a true pro.  Smooth.  She sensed it when my own oxygen began to run out.  She had to have seen it in the finality of my expressions.  The desperation of my emotions.  The expression of agony of two decades of being mentally lynched within the halls of solitary confinement. 

“Can I ask you one final question?” she asked with a smile.  I invited her to ask me anything, confident that nothing asked would be too complicated for me, until she asked, “Do you have any regrets?”

Mentally?  I began to perspire.  Emotionally – I could see air-bubbles form with no words.  I was caught off guard.  Speechless.  Suffering from a ten-second delay of censorship.  Was this a trick question?   Was she asking about my case?  My life as a whole?  I was truly confused and didn’t like it.  I rubbed my head, looked into the camera and explained that I was innocent in every way from the conviction that molested my freedom from me.  Sure – it wasn’t what she wanted.  But, it was what I needed.  I needed to say it.

I’ve been told an Italian saying that goes, “Vivere Senza Rimpianti” – to live with no regrets.  And when I came back online mentally, that was the only thought I had.  So, I told her, “I have no regrets.”  Perhaps I regret saying that without fully explaining what I meant.  Perhaps not.

What no one can see is that I’m not the same person I was when I was free, thinking I knew everything about everything, when in reality I knew nothing about anything.  I’ve traded in gangster rap lyrics for informative literature.  I now get intoxicated on history, philosophy, politics, psychology.  Not beer, wine or champagne.  I’m a different person today because…  and I HATE to admit this, but my limited environment gave me access to unlimited knowledge.

Since I’ve been on death row, I’ve met so many people from all over the world.  People I have no doubt I would have never encountered had such a wicked kismet not fallen upon me.  People I love more than I love myself.  People who have educated me, visited me, defended me and my innocence and have taken care of me as if I was always one of their own.  A love that transcends mere words of affection.  A love that does not judge my past, but supports my future.  A love that isn’t defined by social acceptance or traditional neglect for those like me who are incarcerated. 

I believe that if you regret some things, you will learn to regret all things.  I love who I am.  It’s my past mistakes that have made me who I am today.  I learned from them.  I grew from them.  You can wish that certain outcomes never happened the way they did, but regrets?  Traditionally, our mental wells have been poisoned into not challenging clichés and social norms when we know a challenge is needed. 

When I told the reporter, “I regret nothing,” I meant that.  For I could not and do not want to entertain an existence where I live without my friends who are family.  I wouldn’t trade my freedom for them.  Living would be a ‘regret’ if I didn’t have them in my life.  Vivere Senza Rimpianti! 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR.  Charles “Chucky” Mamou is living on Death Row in Texas.  He is out of appeals and has always maintained his innocence.

He can be contacted at:
Charles Mamou #999333
Polunsky Unit 12-CD-53
3872 South FM 350
Livingston, TX 77351

Writing By Charles Mamou

Loading

Name Drop

For several months when I was a kid, we lived on Powell Street, a lowly urban neighborhood rich with crime.  Daylight brought a liveliness for drugs and alcohol, while nighttime a thirst for violence.  Powell Street was a cautious city block where pilfers and opportunists inhabited the shadows, and a street hustler, Slim Rodgers, stood at the heart of its workings.

Slim was ghetto royalty, a middle aged, bald headed, ebony prince, whose influence pressed on the locals. He was exceptionally introverted with keen observation, often lounging on the porch in his Lazyboy recliner while overseeing the day’s take.  Occasionally, he doled out coins to the neighborhood kids for sweets at the corner bodega. We didn’t dare to steal.  If we were caught stealing, it was said that Slim would ‘get us’.  I thought it meant he would get us in our sleep.

Once, after spending all our coins at the arcade, we headed over to the liquor store to bum for spare change.  Slim found out.  He corralled us together with a heated glare, then marched us up the street to his apartment. After disappearing inside, Slim returned holding a yard rake, trash bags and a velvety purple pouch.  He said that begging was disgraceful, and if we wanted something, we should work for it.  At seven, I had no idea what the word ‘disgraceful’ meant, but I still swore off begging.  Slim handed over the items and tasked us to rake leaves; the pouch was filled with coins.

One summer day in 1981, while Powell Street happened outside, tragedy nearly struck my family.  We were gathered in the rear bedroom of our apartment, my mother tending to the diaper change of her newborn daughter.  My brother, Ray, was making weird faces to distract Sophia, whose bawling was unsettling the quiet evening, while I snickered away in the corner. For my untimely humor, I received the worst detail of all.

“Here…” my mother said as she bundled up the stinky diaper, “…go put that in the trash.”

I clamped the diaper with two fingers and hurried toward the kitchen, my scrunched nose grateful for the midday breeze.  Once there, I chucked the waste into the trash bin, then lustily eyed the fridge as I figured on some stolen sips of Kool-Aid. I peeped down the hallway, cracked the icebox, and guzzled the sweetened beverage.  My mischief was suddenly shattered by an eerie, watchful presence. I turned to the door, and there stood a stranger.

He was tall and beefy with a matted afro, his beard tuft and nappy.  His light colored tee was darkened with stains and drooped over narrow shoulders, and his hulking fist was wrapped around a brown paper bag as he tarried on the porch and peered into the kitchen. Uncertainty fixed our gazes on one another, while the awkwardness of the moment rendered us still.  He then glanced over his shoulder, tugged on the handle and said, “Hey!  Open this door!”

I sat the pitcher aside and headed over to the door, where the strange man dithered noticeably. Stretched upward on my tiptoes, I fumbled at the latch when I heard my mother shout disapproval. 

“Duck, what chu’ doing, boy!  You better git away from that door!” 

I jumped back, confused by the stranger’s face, which twisted in defiance.  A violent pop announced his intrusion, as the door blasted open.

My mother rushed over and pulled me close behind, while I struggled to see around her sturdy frame. The man moved into the kitchen with his eyes wild and his hand fastened to a gun. It had chrome cylinders, much like a cap gun, except heavier and more menacing. Immediately, I thought, ‘I want one’, as the urgency in his voice grabbed my attention.

“Where Slim at?”

“Who?” my mother responded, her own voice standoffish.

“Slim!” he repeated.

“Slim don’t stay here. He lives next door.”

There was an unexpectedness in the air that filled the awful silence, as protector and intruder faced off. Finally, he muttered, somewhat apologetically, “Uh… can I go out the front door?”

A profound sense of relief poured through the room, dousing any signs of trouble. It seemed as though discord had no place wherever Slim was mentioned.  With a nod, my mother permitted the man’s exit, as he tucked the gun away. He then dashed across the living room, peeked through the window and vanished out the door.

Within moments, my mother’s anger turned my way.  “Don’t cha know that man could’ve killed us!” 

Unsure if I was being questioned or warned, I decide to keep quiet. She hauled me to the bedroom where my siblings remained, then she went about securing the house.  When she returned, my mother sat with me and disclosed a terrible truth.

“Everyone who shows up at your doorstep aren’t always good people,” she explained.  “Some may try to hurt you, or worse.”  She counseled me to never open the door for a stranger, and I promised that I wouldn’t.

It would be many years later before I realized the dire possibilities of that day.  I watched as my mother jumped into action to protect her children with little regard for her own safety.  Her devotion was the mark of a great parent and something I hoped to inherit someday.  It was discovered that the man had robbed a liquor store, and he was desperate to hide out.  His intrusion gave me a glimpse into the hostile capabilities of wrongdoers in their efforts to avoid penalty.

However, the thing that impacted me the most that day was the measure of one’s power and influence, how some circumstances are dictated by the promise of retribution. I witnessed as Slim’s reputation alone tamed potential tragedy. I wanted that same power and reputation someday, if only to protect my family. I wanted conflict and disorder to be a fleeting notion in the face of my influence. It would shape my perspective in a way that was flawed, affecting poor choices.

Slim, too, was flawed by certain legal standards, but he wasn’t without decency. He was not the ideal role model for kids, but neither was he unworthy to inspire.  My childhood hero was not some great man honored throughout the pages of history, but I will forever be inspired by the day our lives were secured at the very mention of the name Slim.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Terry Robinson writes under the pen name ‘Chanton’. Terry is a gifted and thoughtful writer who is currently working on two novels. He lives on Death Row but maintains his innocence. Mr. Robinson can be contacted at:
Terry Robinson #0349019
Central Prison
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285

All Posts By Chanton

Loading

The Cell II – My Refuge

My concrete cocoon transforms me
From chaos to consciousness.
I come forth
From concrete and metal
A changed man.

My temple,
Where I achieve spiritual fulfillment.
Here, I offer my call of silent thoughts
To appeal for
Strength, discipline and guidance.

My shrine,
Where the walls become an alter,
Displaying photos of my ancestors
And the living faces of those I worship
And bestow praise upon.

My refuge of solitude,
That shields me from the inflated egos
And programmed torpedoes,
Armed prisoners and guards,
Who wish to do me harm.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Ojore McKinnon writes from death row in Califorinia, where he has resided since March of 1999. He has always maintained his innocence. He can be contacted at:
Crandell Ojore McKinnon
#P-32800
CSP – S.Q.
San Quentin, CA 94974

Loading

“Oh, That’s Chad”

In June, 1993, I came home after serving 27 months in prison.   While I was gone my mother had relocated from the projects where I grew up to an upscale community on the outskirts of town.  I arrived home to a section of seemly brick homes, spacious yards and lush greenery in a neighborhood that was relatively safe – but boring.

The morning after I arrived, I checked the mailbox at the end of our driveway and later strolled to the neighborhood store, noticing each time I left that I drew the attention of a young boy across the street.  He had sunbaked hair, hazel eyes and skin the color of butterscotch, with a slender frame under clothes that were marked by rough play.  In the yard were toys and other objects to which he showed no interest, seemingly content to sit and stare all day.  When my mother  returned from work, I inquired about the strange boy across the street.

She succinctly replied, “Oh, that’s Chad.”

In the following days Chad proved to be as normal as the other kids as they boisterously played throughout the day.  Oftentimes he tussled with his dog or shot hoops in the backyard, other times he simply observed.  He was around eight years old with two older siblings and a kid sister. Their mother worked two jobs, and their father frequently came and went. Their house wasn’t the most adult supervised one on the strip, but it was a crime-free neighborhood so there was little concern.

One day I set out to walk our dog and saw Chad headed my way at a determined pace, his head held sharp and unwavering.  He stepped to me and asked if he could walk my dog.  I didn’t have the heart to tell him no. Before I knew it, I was strolling around the neighborhood with the most inquisitive kid ever. Many of his questions had simple answers, though Chad posed them in a difficult way.  He had a budding curiosity that was pleasant company and reminded me of myself at his age.

Soon Chad found an excuse to come over almost every day, whether to help with yard work or to show me something he had found.  His attentiveness gave me such a feeling of relevance that I looked forward to having him around. One time a friend of mine spent the night.  She went outside early for the morning newspaper, and when she returned, she asked, “Who dat lil’ boy sittin’ on ya’ll doorstep?”

I guessed safely and answered, “Oh, that’s Chad.”

Chad and I often fished at the local pond or practiced target-shooting with pellet guns. We washed cars, mowed lawns and played video games all for the sake of filling the days.  He was so willing to learn and committed to work that he never once complained.  And although he could be incredibly annoying at times, he was still the best part of waking up to a new day.

Two years would pass before trouble pierced our rural haven, and I wound up handcuffed in the back of a squad car.  Chad looked on from the curb with confusion etched on his face.  I sat in prison for 31 months for a crime I didn’t commit, and by the time of my release, I was a fragment of myself with little good to offer.

Chad was like a one-man welcoming party, exhilarated by my return. Just seeing him helped me to shuck some of the bitterness and appreciate the warmth of home.  I would peep outside some days and see Chad sitting idly on his porch waiting for our front door to open.  When it did, he would rush over just to say, “Hi.”  He was the reason I stayed home many a day, though my vengeful heart kept me gone most nights. 

I turned to drug dealing and petty crimes to validate my sense of self-worthlessness, carrying on destructively to mirror how I felt inside. I was caught between being a hooligan by night and a mentor to Chad by day, as I appropriated stories of my nighttime endeavors to preserve a wholesome image. Occasionally, Chad would ask if he could go with me to town, and I would come up with an excuse.  Then I discovered that not only was he a curious bug, he was also quite persistent.

One night I arrived home around 2 a.m. to reup on drugs, not the least bit surprised when Chad wondered over.

“What’s up, Duck?  Are you staying home?” he asked.

“Nope,” I answered while in a mad dash inside to grab the dope supply and head back to the block.

When I returned, Chad was still there waiting in the chill of night, determined to get a word.  “Lemme go wit’ chu, Duck.  I’ve got money.”

“I’ve got sumpthin’ to do tonight, Chad.”

It was the scene that had played out countless times before except this time the outcome was different as his shoulders collapsed and his smile faded.  He turned and started for home.

“Hey, Chad….” I called out to him without giving it much thought because at that moment all that mattered was his happiness,  “…C’mon, get in the car.”

Ecstatically, Chad bound over and jumped in the backseat as I dipped inside the house, removed all the illegals, and joined him in the taxi.

We were dropped off in the filthiest, most crime-infested area in the heart of the city’s drug market, where the unlikeliest shadows gave rise to dope fiends jonesing for a fix.  Cars cruised surreptitiously along narrow side streets as dealers kept an eye out for trouble, and while many residents’ doors were closed and bolted for the night, others were just beginning to open.

The first spot we headed to was the bodega for knickknacks and arcades. We then took in a spectacle of rambunctious trash-talkers over an intense game of craps. With loads of money scattered on the ground and vulgarities stirring, I thought it best that we split, and Chad didn’t have to be told twice to move – he stayed close behind. 

Next we walked a few blocks to the poolroom for chili cheese fries and chicken wings, then we settled in a vacant park and scoffed down our meals.  While there, Chad delved up tons of questions, some even provoking thought, and I could tell that he was having the time of his life because I was too. 

We finished off the night with a fast-food breakfast and caught a taxi home at the cusp of dawn. Once there, Chad hopped out with a yawn and said, “Thanks, Duck. I’ll see ya later, a-ight.”

I watched as he shuffled to his house across the street and disappeared behind the door, not knowing that it was the last time I would ever see Chad.

Days later I was charged with murder and within a year I was sentenced to death.  I prayed that Chad would get used to me not being around anymore. 

Four years later, I learned through a visit with my mom that Chad had been killed. It happened during a skirmish that he was fatally injured and his body was recovered in the woods.  I couldn’t believe it – Chad was gone and he was only sixteen.  I sat with the news gnawing at my conscience, feeling crushed beneath a swell of guilt while imagining the inquisitive kid I first met – not understanding why someone would want to take his life. I blamed myself for not being there for Chad and prayed to take his stead.  He was a much better person and deserving of life than I could ever be.

I have lived with the guilt of Chad’s death for over sixteen years with tomorrows still to come, wondering how our lives would’ve been had I not gone away.  I try not to remember how Chad was taken – I remember how he lived, and I’ll forever keep the fond memory of our night on the town together.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Terry Robinson writes under the pen name ‘Chanton’ and lives on death row. He has always maintained his innocence for the crime he is incarcerated for, but often uses his writing to honestly confront the mistakes he’s made in his life. His honest revelations are an inspiration and a testament to who he is.

Mr. Robinson can be contacted at:
Terry Robinson #0349019
Central Prison
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285

All Posts By Chanton

Loading

Unethical Madness

The first time I ever struck my girlfriend, Renee, it was due to a lapse in judgment.  I begged her forgiveness and vowed it would never happen again.   At the time, I really meant it…

My second offense came when I shoved her to the ground and cast the blame down with her.  My woeful sense of embarrassment made me deserving of pity, while the real victim apologized to her aggressor.

By the third time, the abusiveness had become a force of habit sparked by jealousy and anger.  I believed that if I didn’t hit her, then I would lose her, which made undermining my integrity necessary.

Renee and I met on Halloween night, 1989.  I was fifteen and hanging out at a friend’s house when she appeared from next door to borrow sugar.  Renee was barefooted with piercing brown eyes, cropped cinnamon hair, and wearing thigh-high shorts and a fitted tee.   She was tiny but feisty, with a daring personality and striking appeal.  While pranks and sweets were  the order of the day, the night was filled with promise as we sat cuddled up in a dark corner getting to know one another. 

The next night served a crushing blow to my ego when Renee ran off with another guy.  The two of them disappeared into the night for hours while I was left to sort through my suspicions.  Snared by the thorns of her charming whispers, I continued to pursue Renee, though nesting in the back of my mind was a nagging skepticism.

Renee was thirteen with an infant son by a guy who questioned the child’s paternity.  He showed up one day yelling obscenities and swore that he would never return.   After that, becoming a father figure was the most exciting and important part of each day.  No longer was I a kid who grappled with his mom over curfews and academics. Fatherhood had given me purpose.  I began to skip school to spend time with my son and sat by his crib while he slept.  I chipped in for diapers and formula when I could afford it, other times I stole.  Being partly responsible for a life other than my own made me feel as though I mattered, and I couldn’t give that feeling up for anything in the world… so things had to work out between myself and Renee.

Once, after being scolded by Renee’s dad, I decided to stay away for a week.  When I returned, I discovered that Renee had moved on with some other guy.  Emotionally wrecked, I walked away toward a life without Renee until she started rattling off an explanation so earnestly that before I knew it, I was staying.   Afterwards our relationship became brittle devotions laced with icy disputes.  Loving Renee was difficult at times, but somehow, staying was easy.

Amidst continuous doubts of faithfulness, the violence of our sordid union arose.  Renee and I had argued, our moods were tense and the dissension between us escalated.  As usual Renee went into explanation mode, but it was becoming redundant.  Her groveling and swift affection were no longer a remedy.  I was getting out.

Agitated, Renee grabbed onto my clothes to prevent my leaving. Then she cocked her fist and socked me in the nose.  I doubled over, thinking, ‘What the hell just happened,’ as blood and pride trickled to the ground. Even more confusing was her immediate sympathy as she showered me in apologies and kisses.  Her show of cold/hot affection left me sifting through my head for answers and strangely enough, I felt loved.  It was a critical turning point in our relationship and the seed of a fantastic delusion as I rationalized – a love that hurt was better than no love at all. 

Some months passed before a guy popped up and claimed to be Renee’s boyfriend.  Apparently the two were dating at school, and he had hoped to take things further.  I was so furious with Renee for not denying his claim that I tried to leave, but I couldn’t.  My entire world had collapsed at my feet while she stood blank-faced and busted. I demanded that she choose – either him or me.  She hesitated.   I became so desperate to prove how much I loved her, I lashed out and slapped Renee.  My palm flared with the sting of indignity as I watched her crumble at my feet.  I then turned my rage on the schoolyard beau as he hurried on his way. 

Appalled by my disgrace, I immediately deflected the blame.  It was all Renee’s fault, she forced me to hit her, and I wept with self pity and a little self-loathing as Renee accepted guilt. Even though I promised to never hit her again, I could sense a drastic change.  I was deep in the throes of a twisted evolution, and the worst was yet to come.

Soon we were both cheating on love and committed to hurting one another, like the time she pressed a razor blade to my neck or when I clipped her across the head with a log.  Ironically, the abuse didn’t seem egregious, just something we expected, typical behavior that was progressively volatile yet reinforced our love.

Renee and I did share wonderful moments together that made the pain worthwhile. Oftentimes she was my best friend and the person I trusted most.  It was only when the trust was questioned that we tended to bicker and fight – except, Renee hadn’t thrown a punch in years… the fighting was all me.

Then one night, the illusion shattered and all that remained was the truth.  It happened during a cheating allegation that I found myself plotting revenge.  I lured Renee to an area that was dark and secluded, then I rehashed an earlier dispute.  Renee was flustered and caught off guard, her responses rather dodgy.  I then drew back my fist with all the love that I could muster, and I punched her in the face.  She stumbled back, horrified, and attempted to bolt, but I grabbed her and struck her again, slamming her to the ground.  I insisted on the truth but the truth wasn’t what I was after, it was that fleeting moment of gratification by reciprocating the hurt.  Renee scooted away crying and pleading as my vicious love closed in. Then she looked up at me with her mouth filled with blood and said, “Please don’t hurt me, Duck.”

I stopped abruptly, guilt ridden and dejected as my fist fell limp at my side.  I’d never considered that Renee actually feared me and to see such a thing was unnerving.  I thought of our rambunctiousness as roles we played to indicate our love for one another, yet to see someone you love who’s afraid of you was utterly self defining. 

I stood ruined, trying to recognize myself, but all I saw was a monster who would mask the brokenness inside me by victimizing Renee.  I was caught in the cycle of unethical madness that mistook love and perpetuated cruelty.  I’d already witnessed a tragedy at four when my uncle loved his wife with bullets. My daddy was known to love with his hands, but my mother wanted something better.   And there I was, resorting to violence to salvage an aching love.  I had become someone I detested, a man of wavering integrity.  I abused Renee not because I loved her, but to scare her into loving me.  It was a menacing tactic to manipulate her feelings while empowering my own.  But a love that is fostered by fear and violence is hardly love at all, but simply the substance of shame and dishonor that never quite goes away.

Suddenly, I realized that life had more to offer us both, though it was unlikely that we would find it together.  But I did love Renee enough to know I would never hurt her again.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Terry Robinson writes under the pen name ‘Chanton’ and lives on death row. He has always maintained his innocence for the crime he is incarcerated for, but often uses his writing to honestly confront the mistakes he’s made. Mr. Robinson can be contacted at:
Terry Robinson #0349019
Central Prison
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285

All Posts By Chanton

Loading

Harris County’s Mamou Verdict – An Argument Against The Death Penalty

In 1999 Wayne Hill, Charles Mamou’s court appointed defense attorney, thanked Mamou’s mother, Angelice, when she handed him a letter he could use to defend his client.   Mamou was facing the death penalty, in a case centered on a ‘confession’ to murder.  A confession Mamou said never happened.  His defense attorney held in his hands a letter written by the man claiming to have heard the ‘confession’, Terrence Dodson.   In the letter written to Mamou, Dodson wrote, “I’m glad you didn’t tell me shit about that cause I don’t wanna know shit, I feel better off that way.”

In addition to the letter, Wayne Hill had access to Dodson’s video statement.  Police paid Terrence Dodson a visit early in the investigation when they were looking at him for his involvement in the murder.  At that time, he made a video statement claiming Mamou confessed to him.  Hill had access to that video, and if he watched it, he would have known all the contradictions between Dodson’s statement and his actual testimony in court. 

One of the most significant contradictions was how and when the alleged ‘confession’ took place.  According to Dodson’s video statement, Mamou called him on Tuesday morning from Louisiana – even though Mamou wasn’t even in Louisiana on Tuesday morning – and confessed in a single telephone conversation.  Yet on the stand, Dodson said Mamou began the confession in Texas, face to face, on Dodson’s sister’s porch.  He then went on to say that the confession continued over a ‘couple days’ in ‘several’ conversations.  That wasn’t the only contradiction Dodson made, there were several.

Wayne Hill, the defense attorney, never entered the letter Dodson wrote as an exhibit for his client’s trial. He never mentioned the letter, nor did he mention Terrence Dodson’s many contradictions of his own video statement. 

Terrence Dodson is Charles Mamou’s cousin.  The prosecution used that relationship to solidify their argument of guilt, pointing out that Mamou must be guilty if his own family would testify against him.

They wanted another cousin of Mamou’s to testify as well.  That would make the ‘relative’ argument stronger.  The only problem with the other cousin, Anthony Trail, was, he didn’t know anything about the night in question.  He wasn’t there, and no one had told him anything about what had happened to the victim.  He had no desire to get involved because he didn’t have any relevant information to add.  The prosecution wanted him involved though.  At one point, while being questioned, he had decided he would not testify.  Then a man came into the room.  According to Trail, he believed the man was the victim’s father, and that was the impression he was given.  The man proceeded to persuade Trail to get involved and eventually Trail agreed to testify.  We will probably never know if it was actually the victim’s father who persuaded him or someone that was just trying to give that impression.   Trail’s testimony added nothing material to the trial because Trail had no knowledge of what happened that night nor had anyone shared with him a ‘confession’.  The prosecution didn’t ask him those things on the stand, but rather used him as another ‘family member’ who testified against Mamou.  They asked Trail about some sunglasses Mamou and he had picked up the day after the murder, leaving the impression the glasses were some type of evidence, but it was never pointed out for the jury by the prosecution – or defense – that the glasses they picked up were nearly five miles from the crime scene. 

Throughout the Mamou trial a sexual assault was repeatedly referred to for the majority female jury.  Although it was presented as important in the courtroom, outside of the courtroom there was no urgency to find out if any sexual assault actually occurred that night.   Dr. Joyce Carter ordered a rape kit to be done when the body was found, to include oral swabs, fibers, clothing, fingernail scrapings, etc.  On December 11, 1998, those items were picked up by an HPD officer and placed in the HPD property room freezer.  There they sat.  The rape kit was not ordered to be processed until long after Charles Mamou was in custody.  Eight months after the crime, on July 8, 1999, and shortly before Mamou’s trial the D.A.’s office requested the rape kit be processed by the HPD crime lab.  The results – no semen was detected on any items analyzed. 

Although the District Attorney’s office ordered the test processed and was given the results, graphic references to sexual assault were repeatedly used throughout the trial, in what appeared to be an effort to inflame the jury – although Mamou was  never charged with sexual assault.  There was never any evidence a sexual assault took place by anyone, according to the incident report. 

Mamou’s defense team left the sexual assault accusations without argument, never telling the jury that a rape kit was processed months after the crime that turned up nothing.  

Also of note, ‘hairs were collected from the t-shirt’ of the victim.  The hairs were never mentioned by the prosecution or the defense.   It appears they are still in the HPD property room.

Charles Mamou always maintained his innocence, and the only witness statements available support his account of his whereabouts that night, although a couple statements appear to be currently missing as of an Open Records Request done this year.  What is known is – the victim and Charles Mamou were both on Lantern Point Drive at approximately 12:00 midnight on the night of December 6, 1998.  On that point, all accounts are in agreement.   After a drug deal gone wrong, Mamou and Samuel Johnson drove away in two separate cars, with the victim in the backseat of the car Mamou was driving. 

Charles Mamou says both men drove to an apartment complex on Fondren where he was staying while he was in Houston – about a ten mile drive.   That is also the location where Johnson lived.    

A witness statement taken from the woman who lived at the apartment where Mamou stayed that night indicates Mamou was back at her apartment at approximately 12:45.  In her statement she spoke of waking up at “about 12:15 AM.”  She then says, “It seem like was around thirty minutes later I heard a knock on the door.”  She goes on to say, “I asked my brother who was at the door.  He told me it was Chucky.”

That statement indicates that Mamou was exactly where he said he was forty-five minutes later.   Unfortunately – the jury never knew that statement existed and that information was never presented to them by Mamou’s defense team.

During the trial the woman’s husband, Howard Scott, testified and when questioned he was shown his own statement, “when you say Mr. Mamou got there, does reviewing that statement specifically refresh your memory that it was 12:15 and 12:45?” 

Scott’s answer, “Yes.”

Question, “Okay.  So you’re positive it couldn’t have been later than 12:45?”

And the answer, “No, sir.”

Two witnesses who had no reason to defend or support Charles Mamou both supported exactly what Mamou said happened.  The body of the victim was found on Lynchester Drive, a location that was about thirty minutes from the Lantern Point Drive location where the drug deal gone wrong took place.   The prosecution’s version of a sexual assault, murder, and dropping sunglasses at a location on Ashford Point Drive – couldn’t have been done in 45 minutes.  The time constraints were never outlined for the jury.

There is something else very troubling about Howard Scott’s testimony.  The statement he was shown while on the witness stand – is not in the case file as of the recent Records Request.   

Howard Scott made two statements to police – one on Tuesday, December 8, and one on Wednesday, December 9.   The incident report, received through an Open Records Request only includes one statement.  The Incident Report refers to the ‘missing’ statement on December 8, “It was then decided to bring Howard Scott to the homicide office to be interviewed there since there were some discrepancies between his story and Robin’s.  Officer Hollins then transported Howard Scott to the homicide office where he was interviewed by Sergeant Novak.”   This interview is not in the incident file that was received pursuant to the Open Records Request. 

The missing interview is mentioned more than once.   It is also referred to later in the incident report, stating that at 9:45 on Wednesday, December 9, Sergeants Yanchak and Ferguson went to pick up Robin and Howard Scott to be ‘re-interviewed’. 

It is referred to again, “On this date, Sergeant Yanchack and Sergeant Ferguson assisted Sergeant G.J. Novak and Officer H.F. Chisolm in the follow up investigation into this offense.  Earlier this date, we had ‘re-interviewed’ two witnesses named Robin Marie Scott and her husband, Howard Scott.”

Even on Page 3 of Howard Scott’s statement taken on Wednesday, December 9, 1998, he refers to the interview the day before, on Tuesday, December 8, 1998, “Around 11:30 AM two detectives showed up and began asking me about Chucky.  I told them that Chucky left earlier and gave them permission to search my house. I later came with them to the homicide division.”

But, Howard Scott’s first statement did at one time exist and was also referred to in the court transcripts when Wayne Hill asked Scott to look at it and refresh his memory.  The second statement of Howard Scott’s makes no reference to when Mamou arrived back at his apartment, so the statement referred to in court is the one that is now currently missing from the file.

There are other things that appear to be missing from the file, unless the detectives did not document their work.  According to a News Release put out by the Houston Police Department shortly after the crime, “A second suspect drove away in what was initially described as a red Dodge Intreped.  It has since been determined the vehicle was an orange Dodge Concorde that was recovered and inspected.”  The news release referred to the vehicle that Samuel Johnson was driving that night. 

During the trial Johnson was specifically asked about that car.  “Did the police then examine your car?”

Johnson, “They examined it a couple of days after I got out of jail.”

Although there are photographs of the vehicle in the file, there is no written report or documentation regarding what was found in the vehicle. 

According to Samuel Johnson, a resident of Houston as well as an employee of Orkin at the time, he went home after the drug deal, drank a soda, took a shower and went to bed, not even disturbing his wife to tell her of his involvement in a shoot out on a dark alley.   And there is no documentation other than photographs of anything that was discovered inside of the vehicle he was driving.

Other documentation not included in the file are any notes or statements made by other parties located at the apartment complex that night, including interviews of Shawn Eaglin.   Eaglin was an integral part of introducing several of the parties according to statements, and the police spoke to him.  But there are no statements or interview notes in the file regarding interviews of him.  As with the vehicle documentation, there is no way to know if the detectives chose not to document their work or if the documents have been removed from the file.  But, according to Robin Scott’s statement, she discussed with Eaglin the homicide division going to her home, Shawn’s home, and the employer of Shawn’s cousin, ‘Ced’.

According to Robin Scott’s and Howard Scott’s statements, Eaglin was at the apartment complex on the night in question and it would be expected that detectives spoke to him.   Unfortunately, there is no record of those conversations.

In addition to the impossibility of the 45 minute window of time – it is highly unlikely Mamou could have located the backyard of the house for sale on Lynchester Drive where the body was found.  He was from Louisiana, and not a resident of Houston.   In the Houston Police Department’s incident report, the location was described by a detectives as follows, “The 9200 block of Lynchester Street is located in the Keagan’s Woods sub-division located on the south side of the 14000 block of Bissonnet Street in Harris County.  The Keegan’s Woods subdivision is best accessed by turning south onto Bering Wood Street and continuing south to Plantation Valley and then turning west on Plantation Valley.  Lynchester Street intersects with Plantation Valley.  Lynchester Street does not intersect with Bissonnet and is a difficult street to locate.”  That is how a HPD detective described the location, and an investigator recently told me she had difficulty locating it, even with her GPS.   

The ability of Charles Mamou, a resident of Louisiana, to have found the location was never brought up by Mamou’s defense attorney for the jury. 

For whatever reason, Charles Mamou’s defense team did not present most of the above information.  The jury wasn’t left with a lot to consider regarding Mamou’s innocence.  As unusual as this may sound – they were given a lot more than in a typical trial.  The jury was shown autopsy photos and heard painful, heart wrenching testimony from family members of victims of crimes Mamou was never charged with.   As unbelievable as that may sound – it happened.   Mamou’s mother, Angelice, was on the elevator with some jurors when she heard them discussing how they were going to decide.  It was agreed by the jurors she overheard that they would, ‘vote with the majority’.   Ms. Mamou reported what she overheard at the time it happened, but nothing came of it.

They say truth is stranger than fiction.  Charles Mamou has been in prison for twenty years, most of it in solitary confinement on death row.  Blind faith in the courts is often misplaced.  According to the National Registry of Exonerations, the number of exonerations is currently at 2,488.  It would be a good bet that a state such as Texas, that executes numerous people a year – has executed innocent people.  If the witnesses are to be believed in the Mamou case, there will be one more when he is executed.  He couldn’t have done the things he will die for in the time allotted for him to do it.  There is not one shred of physical evidence putting him at the scene of the crime.  There is not a weapon to test.  There is not a footprint at the scene.  There is not a fingerprint at the scene.   The jury was shown photographs and heard testimony from crimes Mamou was never charged with.  Mamou was portrayed as having sexually assaulted someone without a shred of evidence and his attorney did not point that out.   There was substantial evidence to call into question the testimony of the key witness who said Mamou confessed, that was never presented by the defense.   There are ‘hairs’ that no one seems concerned to follow up on.   There was no independent lab testing ever done by the defense.    There is documentation that was either never filed or is no longer accounted for – in addition to a statement that at one time existed – but seems to have disappeared. 

It reminds me of something I heard recently – close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.  Can we add ‘or in a courtroom’ with a public defender, the wrong skin color, the wrong year, the wrong state…

Anyone with information regarding this case can contact me at kimberleycarter@verizon.net.  Anything you share with me will be confidential.

TO CONTACT CHARLES MAMOU:
Charles Mamou #999333
Polunsky Unit 12-CD-53
3872 South FM 350
Livingston, TX 77351

Loading

“Because People Are Supposed To Help Each Other”

From the time I was a tyke until my early teens, my family frequented a city park that sat on a hill overlooking the southeast region of the city.  The hill was  a year round source of entertainment – in winter months we would sled down it’s slopes, and in the summer we would glide down on large sheets of cardboard scavenged from the dumpsters behind Safeway.

I would tag along with my mom to the malls on Saturday mornings unless my dad had a fishing trip or other excursion planned.  It wasn’t that I enjoyed shopping so much, it was more about the perks that came along with shopping. 

For one, we were away from home the entire day, which meant eating out at the fast food joint of my choice.  In addition to lunch for being a ‘good boy’ while mom tried on what seemed like a million articles of clothing, I earned treats which could take many forms – anything from sweets at Dairy Queen to an after shopping activity like bowling, putt-putt, skating, a movie, or games at the arcade. 

On one such Saturday, I chose to go cardboarding at the park after lunch.  We went and got our boxes – the best ones were the toilet paper or paper towel boxes because they were quite large – and drove to the park.  On that particular day we couldn’t find a close parking space near our favorite sliding spot, so we parked on the opposite side and had to walk. 

We locked up the car and set off, lugging our cardboards.  About halfway to our destination sat a couple of wooden park benches.   At first I didn’t notice the lone woman sitting on one of them, but the closer we got, the harder it became not to notice her.  She had a hanky or some tissue which she was dabbing at her eyes and nose as her shoulders shook.  The closer we got, the louder her sobs became, and I began to feel awkwardly uncomfortable.  I’m not sure if my discomfort was at the thought of walking past her as she sat in distress, or if I was embarrassed for her because I was seeing her cry. 

The former didn’t matter because as soon as my mom realized the woman was crying, she quickened her pace and went to her aid.  I, on the other hand, slowed my pace and crept to the bench beside them.  I heard my mom ask her what was wrong.  The woman leaned into my mom and mumbled something I couldn’t understand and then the dam burst, as she began crying uncontrollably.  My mom wrapped an arm around her and commenced to consoling the woman in the motherly manner that mom’s do.  Over the lady’s shoulder, she looked at me and said, “Go play,” pointing with her free hand at a spot a few feet behind me.

All I wanted to do was get away, so I grabbed my cardboard and retreated, never contemplating how I was to ‘play’ with a piece of cardboard on flat land.  I just wanted to get away from the embarrassment. 

Some time later, mom came and said, “Let’s go.”  I was dejected.  I assumed she meant we were going home, but she turned and headed towards our sliding spot.  Enthused, I snatched up my cardboard and ran after her.  When I caught up, I asked, “What happened to that lady?”

“She went home.”

“No, I mean, why was she crying?”

“She was sad.”

“Did you know her?”

“No.”

“Then why did you help her?”

“Because people are supposed to help each other, that’s why.  It doesn’t matter that I didn’t know her,” then she stopped.  “What if I fell down right now and broke my leg and,” looking around, “that man, right there, came and lifted me and carried me to the hospital.  How would you feel?”

“I’d be… happy,” I said as we continued on.

“So, don’t you think that lady’s little boy would be happy that I helped his mom?”

“I think so,” I said, smiling up at her.

As we reached our spot she said, “Of course, he would.  Now, who is going first?!”

That wouldn’t be the last time I witnessed my mom help a complete stranger.  In fact, sometimes I found myself looking around for distressed individuals – because I saw what helping others did for my mom.  That’s when I realized something I don’t think she ever did – not because she wasn’t capable, but because nothing she ever did was about her – she was healing by helping others.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR. Reshi Yenot is the pen name for a writer who lives on Death Row in Florida. He can be contacted at:
Reshi Yenot
P.O. Box 70092
Henrico, VA 23255

©Reshi Yenot

Loading

Frenemy

Friendships are pleasurable relationships that often stand the test of time.  They are the sharing of ourselves and our innermost feelings with those whom we trust the most. Even cultivating them can be an everlasting treat, like a stroll down the candy aisle of life.  However, just as sweets can be tasty yet terrible for our health, sometimes friends can do more harm than good.

It was a chilly Saturday morning in 1979 – I was five years old. The trailer we lived in was quiet, my mother buried beneath the covers after working a late shift. I poured a bowl of cereal and took my place before the television set, anticipating my favorite cartoons. Suddenly, familiar voices trickled in from outside – it was my older brother Ray, cousin Sam, and Kenny, a neighborhood friend.  I dashed to the bedroom, slipped into some clothes and bolted out the door.  The three of them were bunched together, walking steadily.  Kenny spoke in a hushed tone while Sam and Ray listened. I eased into their group and kept quiet – they paid me little attention.

Their discussion was about the local tadpole pond, which wasn’t much of a pond at all, but rather an abandoned foundation with busted pipes that formed a humongous sinkhole.  We often passed by the vacant site on the way to the corner store, and each time I guessed at the mysterious ripples in the water.  Kenny let on that he and Sam were headed to the pond to see a dog that drowned.  Ray was eight and impressionable – he would follow those two anywhere.  After agreeing to join them, the trio set out while I was tightly wound in their shadow.

We walked a short way before a voice called out and collared me from behind, “Hey, ya’ll, wait up!”

It was Junior, a tubby, spirited kid from around the way who had an enduring appetite for mischief.  He and I were friends, yet often turned rivals whenever my brother was around to stir the competition.  Only then did our Big Wheel rides become fierce battles to the finish line or a game of marbles end in a fight. Our spats never lasted long – Junior and I were usually back to being pals before the turn of day.  His cheeks wobbled like cozy gelatin as he hustled to catch up to our party. 

“Where ya’ll going?” he inquired.

“To the tadpole pond,” I answered.

We arrived at an enclosure and paused to take in the sights, a quaint oasis of thriving vegetation at the edge of the trailer park.  Incredibly dark waters swayed passively with the morning breeze, glistening with the rising sun.  Kenny slipped through a breach in the fence, Sam and Ray soon followed.  I was content to observe from beyond the barrier until Junior squeezed through as well. I tucked my head and dipped past the opening in the fence, fearful yet eerily excited. 

We stood scattered around the water’s edge as the ever dreadful tadpole pond lay before us, polluted with trash and a sodden couch partially submerged at the center.  Kenny pointed out a floating object that was fuzzy and swollen round.   He then looked for something to fish out the carcass while Sam and Ray gathered rocks. Junior fixated on the water and began to inch forward – my curiosity willed me closer.

There were tadpole, tiny critters with long squirmy tails, that flowed along the shallow end.  I squatted low until my reflection bounced back off the face of the water.  It was the first time I’d ever seen a tadpole.

“We need a can,” Junior proposed and disappeared behind me to search for a container. Enthused by the idea of having a pet, I was toying around with names when suddenly I was thrust forward and pitched into the water.

Like a phantom cutpurse, the chilling temperature stole my breath away.  I opened my mouth to yell, but gurgled as the agony gushed in.  My head was a jumble of fear and confusion – frozen with the shocking reality that I was cast beneath the mystery of the rippling pond – and I didn’t know how to swim…

My jacket and denims became weighty with absorption, like linen anchors wrapped around my limbs. Algae and other slush minerals surged down my nostrils and set my lungs afire. I flailed about in a desperate fight against the sinking madness until my wild kicks propelled me above the surface.

Water erupted from my mouth in a vicious spray as the scum fell away from my eyes. I saw my brother racing toward me.

“Help me, Ray!” I pleaded, splashing about to stay afloat until the menacing hand of gravity pulled me under.  I drew in a quick breath and held it tight within as the world collapsed around me.

Slowly, I drifted down into the hazy unknown, kicking, screaming in my head for my mother.  Again, my flapping elevated me, and I burst free from beneath the murky water. Ray shouted words, but they were lost in the frenzy.  Kenny appeared and stretched out toward me.

“Ray!” I cried before my pleas were cut short by another cruel descent into the black.  Lashing out in one final attempt to thwart my tragic end, I somehow grabbed a hold of an object – it was a stick with Kenny holding the opposite end as he plucked me from the horror.

I was drenched, shivering, and felt utterly defeated as I considered the dire possibilities.  Sam peeled off my jacket and replaced it with his own while Kenny assured me that everything was okay. Ray held me tight, but said little as he busied himself with an explanation. And Junior – he was halfway up the block hightailing it for home. 

Today, I saw Junior for the first time in twenty years.  It was a thrilling moment to see how much he had changed, yet concerning for the troubles he faced.  His thick, woolly dreadlocks dangled like tassels over eyes that drooped with sadness, while casting aside his ill-predicament to sympathize for my own. Junior’s trouble was life in prison, mine was the death penalty.  It’s ironic how parallel our lives felt to that day at the tadpole pond.  Still, the quiet agony was short lived and our jaded smiles reciprocated as we stared at one another through a Plexiglas divider and worked to repress our misery.  I realized that Junior was my oldest of friends despite our childhood quarrels. It had been forty years since the tadpole pond, and even now we hurt for one another.  For all the rivaling we did as kids, our friendship survived the chaos – even though he almost killed me, we’re friends all the same. 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Terry Robinson writes under the pen name ‘Chanton’. Terry is a gifted and thoughtful writer who is currently working on two novels. He lives on Death Row but maintains his innocence. Mr. Robinson can be contacted at:
Terry Robinson #0349019
Central Prison
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285

All Posts By Chanton

Loading

I Know Innocent People On Death Row

My Best Friends Are Behind Bars – that’s going to be the title of my book someday.  And some of them are innocent…  

I’m not naïve.  I work with a lot of people who have done a lot of bad things.  They live with regret.   Most of them did ‘something’.   People get exonerated all the time though, and statistically, it was bound to happen – I would find myself working with some innocent people.  What’s fascinating – my innocent friends didn’t tell me they were innocent.  Our writing relationships were the focus, but when my instincts tell me something doesn’t add up, I want to know more. 

This week I heard the federal government was going to resume executing people. That news hurt my heart.  An attorney once told me during a discussion about the flaws in the system, justice is like the highway.  People want to have highways even if they result in lives lost in auto accidents.  She explained it’s the same with justice.  People are willing to have our system of control, even if we lose some people to the ‘mistakes’.  Collateral damage.

I don’t see it that way – there’s no arguable need for the death penalty.  Every state, every country, that executes – executes the innocent as well as the guilty. That’s just a fact.  Is a ‘tough on crime’ stance worth the mistakes when the mistakes are human lives? 

One of my favorite writers, Terry Robinson, lives on Death Row.  He’s never written about being innocent.  After I came to realize he wasn’t capable of what he was there for, I asked him why he didn’t openly speak of it.  He told me he felt it would be disrespectful to the victim of the crime he was incarcerated for to write about that.  That’s the type of man he is.  He has such a quiet dignity and respect for others, I can think of no one who compares.   

It’s because of that character I asked to see his transcripts.  I got some clarity as I read.  He was no angel, and he has never claimed to be.  But the core of who he is was always there.  The night of the crime, Mr. Robinson was ‘in the area’.  He was black.  Another individual who was arrested in connection to the murder said Mr. Robinson did it.  That’s all it took.  That individual is now living a free life. 

When it came time for Mr. Robinson to present his defense, I was anxious to read that portion of the transcripts.  I had read everything the prosecution laid out, and I thought there was a lot left unknown – not to mention DNA that wasn’t tied to anyone.  I was anxious to hear what would be revealed during the next portion of the trial.  I pictured myself, facing a death sentence, and how I would present everything possible, how I could call into question so many things that had been shared.  He would surely tell of where he was and who he was with.  He would contradict the key witness.   After all – it was a trial that could result in a death sentence. 

What I read next, stunned me.  “Judge, we have consulted with the defendant, and it’s his choice not to present evidence at this time.”

I had to reread it…

What?

The next time I spoke to Mr. Robinson, I asked, “So…  You didn’t present any defense.  Am I to understand that correctly?  Why?”

He explained to me how his attorneys told him that if he defended himself it would make him look guilty – so the defense presented nothing.   

What has me scratching my head in confusion will have him executed.  

Terry Robinson was sentenced to death. 

The individuals who had a hand in restarting the federal death machine would obtain the best legal representation available in a criminal case – because they have the means to do that. But – what about those who are a minority?  What about those who are black and convicted in a southern state with all that we know goes hand in hand with that?  What about those whose attorneys are appointed by the Court?  There is an enormous difference between an attorney that is shopped for and one that is operating under a set fee by the courts while also carrying paying clients.  If an attorney has paying clients – the court appointed cases go to the bottom of the stack. That’s reality. 

Terry Robinson has so much character it can’t be covered up with a red Death Row jumpsuit. Mr. Robinson writes under the pen name Chanton.  His essay, ‘Being Better’, which he wrote earlier this year, speaks of accidentally stealing forty dollars nearly two decades ago – and how he was driven to confess that mistake.  ‘Duck’, Chanton, Terry, Mr. Robinson – is ‘collateral damage’. 

It’s okay to say it – you are innocent. You have every right to say it. You are not the first person to be incarcerated for something you didn’t do. You are not the first person on Death Row to know you don’t belong there. There are other people who know you don’t belong there. Your previous mistakes in life don’t make you deserving of this. The loss that is the reason for this discussion is not diminished by you speaking truth. Truth is never a mistake. And the truth is – some innocent people live on death row, and may very well die there.

Mr. Robinson can be contacted at:
Terry Robinson #0349019
Central Prison
4285 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4285

Anybody with information related to his case can contact me at kimberleycarter@verizon.net.  Anything you share with me will be confidential.

Loading

Was Mamou Jury Presented All Available Information?

In Harris County, Texas, 1999, Charles Mamou was sentenced to death in a trial primarily focused on the testimony of a handful of drug dealers involved in the same drug deal, the strongest testimony coming from Mamou’s own cousin who testified Mamou confessed to him.

There were several factors the jury never heard regarding the alleged ‘confession’. 

When Terrence Dodson first heard police had contacted one of his relatives looking for him in connection to a capital murder case, he quickly told police his cousin, Chucky, had confessed to murdering and sexually assaulting the victim.  Charles Mamou was arrested for kidnapping and murder. 

Nearly a year later at trial, what the case lacked in physical evidence, it made up for in the ‘confession’, at times focusing on the sexual assault Terrence Dodson had described to police.  The jury was never presented all the contradictions between Mr. Dodson’s original statement to police and his actual testimony at trial, including the location of Mamou when he supposedly confessed and also how he confessed.  Those contradictions would have brought into question Dodson’s credibility and can be seen HERE.    

The jury was also not shown the letter Dodson wrote to his cousin a month after he told police about the ‘confession’.  In the letter Dodson said, “I’m glad you didn’t tell me shit about that cause I don’t wanna know shit, I feel better off that way.”

There was one more thing the jury never heard.  Charles Mamou was never charged with rape, but it had a significant impact in his trial, so much so that several articles written about the crime indicate that Mamou raped or sexually assaulted the victim.  The sexual assault was one facet of Terrence Dodson’s hour long video statement.  Dodson described how Mamou confessed to a sexual assault several times and also testified to that during the trial.  During Dodson’s testimony, Charles Mamou’s court appointed attorney and the prosecution never informed the jury that a rape kit was completed on the victim, including oral swabs.

When the prosecution was presenting their closing arguments, hoping to convince the jury of Mamou’s guilt and secure an execution, the jury was told, “He marches her to the back, and he makes her commit oral sodomy, makes her suck his penis.  Imagine that, ladies and gentlemen.”  At the time they made this argument, they were aware of Terrence Dodson’s questionable credibility.  They also knew the results from the rape kit, which stated, “No semen was detected on any items analyzed.”

Mamou’s own attorney never mentioned the results of the rape kit to the jury that was to decide his client’s fate.

Harris County, Texas, has sentenced more people to death than anyplace else in the country.  Charles Mamou is one of those people.  He maintains his innocence and is out of appeals and awaiting an execution date. 

Anyone with information regarding this case can contact me at kimberleycarter@verizon.net.  Anything you share with me will be confidential.

TO CONTACT CHARLES MAMOU:
Charles Mamou #999333
Polunsky Unit 12-CD-53
3872 South FM 350
Livingston, TX 77351

Loading